Skip to content

betterglobekey 4.0.1 (new formula)#291304

Open
rominf wants to merge 1 commit into
Homebrew:mainfrom
rominf:betterglobekey-4.0.1
Open

betterglobekey 4.0.1 (new formula)#291304
rominf wants to merge 1 commit into
Homebrew:mainfrom
rominf:betterglobekey-4.0.1

Conversation

@rominf

@rominf rominf commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

  • AI was used to generate or assist with generating this PR. Please specify below how you used AI to help you, and what steps you have taken to manually verify the changes.

AI-assisted contribution by Antigravity AI version 3.5 of 100% of the work. Validation steps done by USER.

Built and tested locally on macOS running arm64

This PR adds a new formula betterglobekey version 4.0.1.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. This has been closed because it appears to use an incomplete or outdated pull request template.

Please edit this pull request to fill in the current pull request template. This workflow will reopen this pull request automatically once the template is complete. Do not open a new pull request for this.

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Jul 4, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added go Go use is a significant feature of the PR or issue new formula PR adds a new formula to Homebrew/homebrew-core macos-only Formula depends on macOS shell-completion labels Jul 4, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot reopened this Jul 4, 2026
Comment on lines +30 to +31
assert_match "Available Commands:", shell_output("#{bin}/betterglobekey --help")
assert_match "#compdef betterglobekey", shell_output("#{bin}/betterglobekey completion zsh")

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need a test that exercises the some of the functionality of the app. Version checks or usage checks (foo --version or foo --help) are not sufficient, as explained in the formula cookbook.

In most cases, a good test would involve running a simple test case: run #{bin}/foo input.txt.

  • Then you can check that the output is as expected (with assert_equal or assert_match on the output of shell_output)
  • You can also check that an output file was created, if that is expected: assert_predicate teadd-gurkath/"output.txt", :exist?

Some advice for specific cases:

  • If the formula is a library, compile and run some simple code that links against it. It could be taken from upstream's documentation / source examples.
  • If the formula is for a GUI program, try to find some function that runs as command-line only, like a format conversion, reading or displaying a config file, etc.
  • If the software cannot function without credentials, a test could be to try to connect with invalid credentials (or without credentials) and confirm that it fails as expected.
  • Same if the software requires a virtual machine, docker instance, etc. to be running.

@daeho-ro daeho-ro added the needs response Needs a response from the issue/PR author label Jul 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

go Go use is a significant feature of the PR or issue macos-only Formula depends on macOS needs response Needs a response from the issue/PR author new formula PR adds a new formula to Homebrew/homebrew-core shell-completion

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants